🚀 Mozn named among 2026 RiskTech100® Leaders by Chartis Research. Check Now

Check Now
Published on
April 28, 2025

Denied Persons List (DPL): Screening, Compliance, and Risk Management

Accelerate AML Compliance: Meet Regulatory Demands with 80% Less Setup Time

Request Demo

Financial institutions are increasingly held accountable for due diligence, making the integration of denied party screening into Anti-Money Laundering (AML) systems not just a regulatory obligation, but a strategic imperative.

What is the Denied Persons List (DPL)?

The Denied Persons List (DPL) is an official list published by the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS). It includes individuals and companies that have been denied the right to export, reexport, or transfer goods, software, or technology that are subject to the U.S. Export Administration Regulations (EAR).

These denials usually result from serious violations of U.S. export control laws such as sending controlled items to unauthorized countries or parties, or attempting to bypass restrictions. Once listed, a person or entity is strictly prohibited from being involved, directly or indirectly, in any transaction involving items regulated by the EAR unless they receive specific authorization from BIS.

For financial institutions, this means it's illegal to support or facilitate transactions that involve someone on the DPL list, whether that’s through payment processing, trade finance, or other services. Doing so can result in severe penalties and reputational damage.

The DPL is publicly available and regularly updated. It is also part of the U.S. government’s Consolidated Screening List, which organizations can use to screen clients, partners, and transactions to ensure compliance.

Is the Denied Persons List (DPL) an International List?

Even though it’s a U.S. list, its restrictions apply worldwide because it governs the use and movement of items that are subject to U.S. Export Administration Regulations (EAR). That includes:

  • U.S.-origin items
  • Items with U.S. content
  • Items made using U.S. technology

So, if a company or bank is based in Europe or the Middle East but is dealing with goods or software that fall under the EAR, they must comply with the DPL. That’s why many non-U.S. financial institutions and multinational companies integrate DPL screening into their compliance programs.

Purpose of the Denied Persons List

The primary purpose of the denied list is to identify individuals, companies, and entities that have been denied the right to export, re-export, or transfer sensitive items due to violations of U.S. export control laws.

Key Objectives of the DPL:

  1. Enforce Export Control Laws: The DPL helps uphold the integrity of U.S. export regulations by restricting violators from engaging in international trade involving controlled goods, technology, or software.
  1. Protect National Security: By denying access to sensitive technologies and goods, the DPL list helps safeguard U.S. national security and foreign policy interests. It prevents unauthorized parties from obtaining items that could potentially compromise these interests.
  1. Promote Compliance: The existence of the DPL serves as a deterrent to potential violations of export control laws. It encourages businesses and individuals to follow legal export practices by highlighting the serious consequences of non-compliance.

Who is on the Denied Persons List?

The Denied Persons List is distinct from other restricted parties lists, such as the Entity List, in that it outright denies export privileges to listed parties, while the Entity List only imposes specific license requirements.

Inclusion on the DPL typically results from formal administrative proceedings and is based on significant violations of U.S. law, such as unauthorized exports or transfers of controlled items. Those placed on the DPL can be based in the U.S. or abroad, and the list includes a wide range of violators, from individuals to large corporations.  

For example, companies like ZTE Corporation have been added to the DPL due to their involvement in exporting controlled items to countries under U.S. sanctions.

Common Violations Leading to Inclusion on the DPL:

  • Exporting controlled items without the necessary licenses.
  • Participating in unauthorized reexports or transfers of U.S.-origin goods, software, or technology to restricted destinations.
  • Providing false information to obtain export licenses.
  • Violating the terms of an existing export license.

Comply quickly with local/global regulations with 80% less setup time

Request Demo

Consequences of Dealing with Denied Parties

Financial institutions and businesses that deal with these on the restricted parties lists face both criminal and civil penalties under the U.S. Export Administration Regulations (EAR).

Criminal penalties may include up to 20 years of imprisonment and fines up to $1 million per violation, or both. Administrative penalties can be up to $300,000 per violation or twice the value of the transaction, whichever is greater.

Additionally, violators may face loss of export privileges, suspension from federal contracting, and cross-debarment from international financial institutions or development banks.

Proactive DPL Risk Management for Financial Institutions

For financial institutions, it's essential to integrate export control compliance into their systems. This includes screening transactions against the denied list and other restricted and denied party lists, conducting due diligence, and implementing real-time checks on clients and third parties involved in transactions.

Institutions should also ensure that transactions involving controlled items are properly authorized under the EAR to avoid penalties. Willfully ignoring restrictions or failing to properly vet parties may be viewed as “knowledge” of a violation, increasing the risk of liability.

How to Determine if Someone is on the DPL

To determine whether an individual or entity is listed on the U.S. Denied Persons List (DPL), financial institutions should use a combination of official government resources and integrated compliance tools.

  • If further verification is needed, especially in complex or ambiguous cases, you can submit a request through the BIS DPL Inquiry Form to confirm a party's listing status.

To strengthen compliance, financial institutions should implement automated screening software that checks clients and counterparties against the DPL and other restricted lists in real time. These tools help flag risks early in the transaction lifecycle.

Difference Between the Denied Persons List and the Entity List

While both the Denied Persons List (DPL) and the Entity List are key tools used by the U.S. Department of Commerce to enforce export controls, they serve different purposes and carry distinct compliance implications especially for financial institutions.

  • The Denied Persons List (DPL) includes individuals and organizations that have been found guilty of violating U.S. export laws, often through activities like unauthorized exports, false statements, or breaches of license terms. Being placed on the DPL means a complete denial of export privileges. These parties are not allowed to participate in any export or reexport transaction involving U.S.-regulated items, directly or indirectly. Engaging with a DPL-listed person or entity without prior authorization is strictly prohibited and can result in severe penalties.
  • In contrast, the Entity List names foreign entities companies, research institutions, or individuals, that the U.S. government believes pose a risk to national security or U.S. foreign policy interests. These parties are not banned outright, but exporters must obtain a special license to conduct transactions involving controlled U.S. goods, software, or technology. These licenses are reviewed with a “presumption of denial,” meaning they are rarely approved.

Key Differences:

  • DPL: Total ban on export privileges due to past violations.
  • Entity List: License required due to potential future risks.
  • DPL includes U.S. and foreign parties, while the Entity List mainly targets foreign entities.

For financial institutions, understanding this distinction is critical to avoiding compliance failures. Screening clients, third parties, and transactions against both lists, and knowing the legal consequences of each, should be a core part of your risk management and due diligence process.

Key Strategies for DPL Compliance and Risk Mitigation

To comply with the Denied Persons List and reduce risks, financial institutions should follow these key practices:

  • Conduct Ongoing Monitoring: Regularly update and review screening procedures to account for changes in the DPL.
  • Document Screening Activities: Maintain records of screening results and actions taken in response to potential matches.

Conclusion

For financial institutions, it's essential to regularly check the Denied Persons List to ensure compliance with U.S. export laws. Engaging in transactions with DPL-listed parties without proper authorization can result in severe penalties, including fines or legal action. Regular due diligence is critical to avoid inadvertently conducting business with restricted parties.

By understanding who is on the DPL and why they are listed, financial institutions and other organizations can better navigate the complex regulatory landscape and mitigate compliance risks.

FAQs

Q1. What does DPL stand for?

DPL stands for Denied Persons List. It is a list of individuals and companies banned from receiving U.S. exports due to violations of export laws.

Q2. What is DPL meaning in business?

In business, DPL refers to a list of parties that cannot receive U.S. exports, reexports, or transfers. Companies must check this list to avoid doing business with restricted parties.

Q3. Who creates Denied Party Lists?

The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), part of the U.S. Department of Commerce, creates and maintains the Denied Persons List.

Streamline Compliance: Achieve 80% Faster Setup for Fraud Prevention

Request Demo

AI-Driven Precision in
Fraud Risk and AML Compliance

Streamline your operations and empower informed decision-making in emerging markets with us.

The Challenge
Organizations face rising financial crime, stricter regulations, and outdated systems. Manual reviews, siloed tools, and false alerts slow down enterprises and leave them exposed.
The solution

Why FOCAL?

FOCAL by MOZN accelerates fraud detection, automates compliance, and keeps organizations ahead of fast-changing risks and regulations.

One Centralized Platform

Bring fraud detection, AML, and due diligence into one seamless AI-native solution.

Adaptive Machine Learning

Self-learning models improve accuracy, cut false positives, and adapt as risks shift.

Localized Intelligence

Built-in rules, watchlists, and data tuned to local regulations and realities.

Rapid Deployment

Pre-built integrations and a single API for faster time-to-value. 

Scalable by Design

Cloud-native, modular architecture that grows across products, channels, and regions.

Expert Support

Local specialists with global compliance know-how at your side.